Diffraction Limit Sharpness vs Depth of FIeld

There is a limit to the resolution of any optical system. That limit is called diffraction and I first ran into the term with astronomical telescopes. In photography, according to optical theory, any lens devoid of aberrations should perform best wide open. In the real world our lenses generally perform best (sharpest) stopped down slightly from wide open, performing best in the range of f/4 to f/8.

In film days we typically closed down our lenses to achieve added depth of field. The reduction of the circle of confusion created by the out of focus image on either side of the point of focus makes the image appear sharper over a greater area. This is still true, providing we do not exceed the diffraction limitation of the lens. The effect of diffraction limitation has a more obvious effect in digital capture than it did in film for reasons I will not pretend to fully understand. The result is an image that loses critical sharpness even at the point of focus. This is because the disc resolved by the lens exceeds the size of the capturing pixel resulting in loss of resolution. That means that optimum sharpness and depth of field are a trade off after you reach the limiting aperture.

The pixel size on a DSLR is a result of the capture resolution, and the size of the pixels related to the lens determines the effective diffraction limitation, not the lens itself. Therefore, the limits change as you put a lens on different camera bodies with differing sensor resolutions. The diffraction limitation of a particular lens of mine is nearly the same on a 10Mp APS-C body as it is on a full frame 22Mp body because of the difference in the size of the pixels themselves.

While it may be helpful to know what your limitations are for a particular camera there are many other factors that will have a greater destructive effect on your images. All optical maximums depend on solid support, shutter speed, ISO noise, and other factors even including the characteristics imparted by the raw converter used to process the file.

For further information I recommend visiting http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/ and searching for diffraction limitation. There is more information there than you probably really want, but the interactive charts can be useful in ballparking the optimum apertures for your camera.

Advertisements

Author: Bryson

Architectural/Commercial/Industrial Photographer - Digital Photography and Photoshop Educator

2 thoughts on “Diffraction Limit Sharpness vs Depth of FIeld”

  1. The resolution testing I’ve done with several lenses suggests that resolution usually improves from one to three stops down from wide open – until you get to f11. Beyond f 11, it appears that diffraction begins to offset the increase in corner sharpness you can achieve by stopping down and even reduces center and mid-frame resolution. However, I wonder if the increased depth of field may be worth the resolution loss at smaller apertures for certain images.

  2. How far down you can stop will depend on the maximum aperture of the lens to start with, of course, but you are assuming a large sensor camera and f/11 will not always prove to be the limit.
    [I am familiar with Peter and the test he is referring to.] Smaller sensor cameras (APS-C and 4/3) will fail at wider apertures even with the same lens and the point of failure will depend on sensor resolution, meaning the size of the actual pixel. The trade off between dof and capture sharpness would need to be determined based on intended use of the image, especially size of reproduction, and the desires of the photographer.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s